Puja Awasthi

Sharmila Joshi

Editor

large_IMG_5810.jpg

medium_IMG_5810.jpg

small_IMG_5810.jpg

thumbnail_IMG_5810.jpg

IMG_5810.jpg

Pramod Kumar gave in only when the calls became incessant. “Give your Aadhaar or lose your number,” the caller said. Since the first half of 2018, such calls had mushroomed in Kumar’s village, Dadeora. So even though he had used the mobile number for three years without any such identification, he cycled for four kilometres one morning in mid-2018 to a SIM card vendor’s shop in the Parsada market. “No questions were asked. The shopkeeper took my Aadhaar and asked me to twice push a button on a small black machine. I could see my photo on the computer screen. He said my SIM would continue to work as before,” recalls Kumar. After that seemingly painless act, Kumar’s wages went missing. The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) had, as far back as 2005,  spoken of the need to verify the identity of SIM card owners, <a href="http://dot.gov.in/sites/default/files/2-2_10.05.2005.pdf?download=1">describing</a> it as ‘a matter of concern …[with] serious security implications’. By 2014, the DoT <a href="http://dot.gov.in/sites/default/files/doc.pdf?download=1">had tweaked this step</a> – now a customer would have to enter his or her Aadhaar number. In January 2017, Airtel became the first mobile services provider in India to open a Payments Bank; its website promised ‘every Indian access to an equal, effective and trustworthy banking experience’.  In Sitapur district’s village, these developments upturned life for 33-year-old Kumar, an unlettered small farmer and labourer. He and many others in his family and village used Airtel SIM cards.

At the time his SIM was being verified, Kumar was digging a pond, the Jhavar Talab, under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Act (MGNREGA). He earned  Rs. 175 a day. In 2016, he had worked for 40 days and his wages had been deposited into his account at the UP Allahabad Grameen Bank in Parsada, the account he had specified in his job card. “Government work is not the best paying. But it is available near home. My parents are old and need looking after. I get to spend time with my children,” says Kumar, who intermittently also works with private road construction contractors for Rs. 200 a day. On construction sites in Lucknow, around 100 kilometres from his village, he can sometimes earn up to Rs. 300 a day. From August to December 2017, Kumar worked for 24 days digging the rocky earth for the pond. He earned Rs. 4,200. But the wages, usually deposited within 15 days of work being completed, did not show up. The wages of some others in his village too had gone missing.Kumar tried different ways to track his money, with help from a local organisation called Sangtin Kisan Mazdoor Sangathan. He confirmed that his attendance at work had been duly noted. He visited the bank every month to check. Twice he went to the MGNREGA block-level office in Machhrehta, around six kilometres away. “I requested them to check in the computer where my money was. They said it had been sent to my account. If the computer said that, it must be true,” says Kumar.

By January 2018, the growing clamour of unpaid workers made it clear that the computers, in fact, did not know everything.This was first disclosed by Vikash Singh, additional programme officer (Sitapur), MGNREGA. In response to a bunch of queries about why wages were not being paid, and repeated demonstrations at his office, Singh had told those protesting against the missing wages that the money was going into 9,877 Airtel Payments Bank (APB) accounts opened across the district since January 2017. Besides payments for labour, these accounts had received gas subsidies, Janani Suraksha Yojana (Safe Motherhood Plan) payouts, agricultural benefits, scholarships and more. In Sitapur Rs. 76.63 lakhs was transferred to such accounts.

Such transfers of state-sponsored benefits directly into bank accounts (Direct Benefit Transfer) were initiated in December 2013, because, the <a href="https://dbtbharat.gov.in/page/frontcontentview/?id=MTc=">DBT Mission</a> says, it is ‘useful in targeting the intended beneficiaries’ and in ‘reduction of fraud’.MGNREGA wages were added to the list of transfers in 2014. Then <a href="http://nrega.nic.in/netnrega/writereaddata/Circulars/Revised_MGNREGS_Camps_for_Aadhaar_Seeding.pdf">repeated directives</a> of the Ministry of Rural Development made it mandatory to link bank accounts of person eligible to receive wages, to their Aadhaar numbers. This, the government claims, has made payments more efficient.In Sitapur, Singh explains, such transfers were made to the “mostly poor and uneducated” in accounts the recipients did not even know existed. Their consent for opening such accounts had been obtained by asking them to just tick a box on the online form while doing the ‘Aadhaar-based SIM verification’. As a result, benefit transfers were diverted to these new accounts. This followed a seemingly harmless guideline of the Unique Identification Authority of India that the bank account seeded last with the Aadhaar number automatically became the account that would receive any money disbursed under DBT. “This is the magic of Digital India,” says Singh. “We feed an account number for an MGNREGA card holder. We can only assume that the payments are going to that account. If any changes are made [for example, if a fresh account linked to Aadhaar becomes the default for payments], there is no way for us to know. The system does not allow it.” Will better awareness ensure this does not happen? Singh laughs. “What awareness does one create? That getting an Airtel SIM is a crime? Without consent, without documents, accounts are being opened. This is a new kind of in-the-air banking. How can one be careful enough?”

Kumar’s is not sure how he acquired an APB account. “A SIM card opens the account. The money goes into Aadhaar,” he explains.  Prompted by others who had discovered their money in such accounts, Kumar visited the Airtel dealer’s office at the Hardoi Chungi toll road, around 14 kilometres away , making the journey by a tempo that charged him Rs. 60 one way. “The man in the shop asked for my Aadhaar. Then he dialled a number. It showed that I had Rs. 2,100 in the [Airtel] account [half of Kumar’s pending Rs 4,200 wages]. He gave me Rs. 100 [cash] saying that it was all he had that day and asked me to come back some other day for the balance.” Kumar went back 12 days later (on 25 June 2018) and got the remaining Rs. 2,000 in cash. After Kumar protested at the block office along with others wages for eight more days, Rs. 1,400 suddenly appeared in his earlier account, the Allahabad Grameen Bank in Parsada. Kumar withdrew that sum as cash. Wages for the remaining four days, Rs. 700, remain missing.  Meanwhile, his family borrowed Rs. 5,000 from relatives. Living in a joint family with his parents and five other siblings buffered some of Kumar’s financial stress during this period. He has three children, and a persistent cough of unknown origin.  “It was not as if we had nothing to eat,” says Meenu Devi, 26, his wife. “But we could have used the money to take our daughter to a private doctor for a skin rash that has covered her entire back.”Kumar has held on to the APB account. He had received a message saying it still had Rs. 55, possibly as interest, he thinks. When he went to the Hardoi Chungi outlet to ask for that money, he was told that only withdrawals in multiples of 100 were allowed.Worried that his wages might still go into this account, he stopped applying for MGNREGA work.What about the vendors who opened such accounts? An APB spokesperson told this reporter, “Appropriate action has already been taken against erring retailers.”

Direct benefit transfer, indirect torture

நேரடி பலன் பரிமாற்றம், மறைமுக சித்ரவதை

প্রত্যক্ষ ভাতা, পরোক্ষ যন্ত্রণা

প্ৰত্যক্ষ লাভ স্থানান্তৰ, পৰোক্ষ যাতনা

प्रत्यक्ष लाभ हस्तांतरण, अप्रत्यक्ष यातना

ڈائریکٹ بینیفٹ ٹرانسفر، بالواسطہ ظلم

थेट लाभ हस्तांतरण, अप्रत्यक्ष छळाला कारण

ସିଧାସଳଖ ଟଙ୍କା ଟ୍ରାନ୍ସଫର, ପରୋକ୍ଷ ନିର୍ଯାତନା

Dadeora

At present, we can only accept donations in Indian rupees by Indian citizens. All donations made to the CounterMedia Trust are eligible for exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Here is a copy of our exemption certificate.


India is bigger than New Delhi. And people need to know more about the rest of this vast nation.


Younger, media-saturated generations are growing up knowing little about their country, but a lot about the elites of a few metros and towns. For a narrowly-owned, commercially-driven media, the dumbing down of a nation is part of standard operating procedure. The last available data of the Centre for Media Studies (CMS, Delhi) show us that reports from New Delhi account for 66 per cent of news on the front pages of major dailies. The CMS data also found that just about 0.24 per cent of front page news came out of rural India. The TV channels are not much better.PARI exists to change that.We are a non-profit organisation. We publish under creative commons, and do not charge readers a subscription fee or put-up advertisements. Nothing is behind a paywall and we are completely free-to-access by anyone. We guard our independence and receive no direct grants from governments and corporations, nor any funding that could dictate our content. So, we are dependent on volunteer labour, donations from individuals, foundations and institutions that see value in independent and free media.PARI is changing the way Indian journalism reports and documents the rural.India is more than the elite of a few metros and towns. We report on rural lives and livelihoods, languages, communities, migrants and more. We need your help to pull off this most ambitious of Indian journalistic endeavours. The scale of this effort costs money. Donate generously - and spread the word about PARI.&nbsp;

Donate FAQs


Let’s get you acquainted

Welcome to PARI

All our content is, and will forever be free to consume. If you enjoy our work, you can support us by becoming a volunteer or by donating to help fund our work.

Want to republish this article? Please write to <a href="mailto:zahra@ruralindiaonline.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">zahra@ruralindiaonline.org</a> with a cc to <a href="mailto:namita@ruralindiaonline.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">namita@ruralindiaonline.org</a>

Direct benefit transfer, indirect torture

When Pramod Kumar of UP's Dadeora village was cornered into linking his Aadhaar to his SIM, his wages as a labourer vanished into a new Airtel bank account, and he entered a maze of looking for his lost money

Related stories

A rain-scented walk in Sivagangai

Living on ravaged land

Biswas and the bamboos on his bike

Recycling energy, Godda style

Bhadels of Goa

Pookadai: still throbbing with morning life

Koli Kadlas

Malnourishment high among children of migrants: study

Wheels of the rural Indian West

Living Under a Red Cloud in Bellary

Vedla – earrings of the Maher community

Dreaming of water, drowning in debt

Kali: the dancer and his dreams

Farmer's diet worse than a convict's

In Yavatmal, life goes on

Suicides are about the living, not the dead

Death of a carpenter

Hoisa Shigmo!

Women farmers: weaving a life in Anantapur

Defiant in Dhinkia

Spice and all that's nice

Kerala's Green Army

The ‘jugaad’ not-a-mobile

Health as someone else's wealth

Calibrating in a Kudumbashree assembly unit