Sanket Jain

large_01-IMG_0946-SJ.jpg

medium_01-IMG_0946-SJ.jpg

small_01-IMG_0946-SJ.jpg

thumbnail_01-IMG_0946-SJ.jpg

01-IMG_0946-SJ.jpg

Laxmibai Kale has been losing a portion of her harvest every year. That’s not been due to excessive rainfall or drought or poor farming techniques. “Our crops are destroyed,” said 60-year-old Laxmibai, “because the panchayat allows animals to graze on the land. I’ve lost count of the losses we’ve suffered.”  The five-acre plot in Mohadi village in Nashik district that Laxmibai and her husband, Waman, have been cultivating for three decades is a part of the gairan – government-controlled village commons used as pasture land. They grow tur, bajra, jowar and paddy there. “The panchayat members say they will file a case against us if we don’t allow the villagers to graze their cattle on our land,” she said. Laxmibai and other farmers from her village in Dindori taluka have been fighting for their land rights since 1992. “I am the third generation [of the family] tilling this land, but we still don’t own it,” she said. “In 2002, we did a satyagraha and a jail bharo andolan for our land rights.” At that time, she recalls, nearly 1,500 farmers, most of them women, spent 17 days in the Nashik Central Jail. With no land title, Laxmibai, who belongs to the Lohar caste – listed as an Other Backward Class in Maharashtra, has no help in dealing with the loss of crop. “Since the land is not in our name, we don’t get [crop] loans or insurance,” she said. She instead absorbs the losses by working as an agricultural labourer, doing two eight-hour shifts in a day sometimes to earn more. Vijabai Gangurde, 55, a Bhil Adivasi farmer and a widow, is in a similar situation. She cannot live off her land in Mohadi. “After working eight hours on my two acres of land, I then work as a farm labourer for another eight hours [on someone else’s land],” said Vijabai, whose days are split into two shifts, starting at 7 a.m.   “But I never seek loans from a moneylender,” she added. “Moneylenders charge 10 rupees interest on every 100 rupees they loan, which has to be repaid by the end of the month.” Laxmibai too keeps away from private creditors. “Moneylenders have harassed widows in the nearby villages,” she said.

Money is tight for women in Mohadi village. Their wages are less than the mens&#39;. They get Rs. 150 for eight hours of work while men get Rs. 250 for the same work. “Even today, women are paid less than men for working much more. Why does the government think these [new farm] laws won’t affect women farmers more?” asks Laxmibai.To protest against the new farm laws, Laxmibai and Vijabai had both come to Azad Maidan in south Mumbai for the sit-in organised by the Samyukta Shetkari Kamgar Morcha on January 24-26. Over <a href="https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/articles/we-have-marched-before-we-will-march-again/">15,000 farmers</a> from villages across Nashik and nearby districts had left in tempos, jeeps and pick-up trucks on January 23 and reached Mumbai the next day. At the maidan, they expressed solidarity with the farmers protesting at Delhi’s borders against the new farm laws, and also demanded their land rights. “We don’t fear the government. We took part in the <a href="https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/the-kisan-long-march-in-maharashtra/">march</a> from Nashik to Mumbai [in 2018], we&#39;ve been to Delhi, and have protested more than two dozen times in Nashik and Mumbai,” said Laxmibai, raising her fist in a gesture of protest. The new laws against which the farmers protesting against are <a href="https://ruralindiaonline.org/library/resource/the-farmers-produce-trade-and-commerce-promotion-and-facilitation-act-2020/">The Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020</a>; <a href="https://ruralindiaonline.org/library/resource/the-farmers-empowerment-and-protection-agreement-on-price-assurance-and-farm-services-act-2020/">The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020</a>; and <a href="https://ruralindiaonline.org/library/resource/the-essential-commodities-amendment-act-2020/">The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020</a>. They were first passed as ordinances by the central government on June 5, 2020, then introduced as farm bills in Parliament on September 14 and hastened into Acts on the 20th of that month. The farmers see these laws as devastating to their livelihoods because they will expand the space for large corporates to have even greater power over farmers and farming. The laws also undermine the main forms of support to the cultivator, including the minimum support price (MSP), the agricultural produce marketing committees (APMC), state procurement and more. They have also been criticised as affecting every Indian as they <a href="https://ruralindiaonline.org/articles/and-you-thought-its-only-about-farmers/">disable the right to legal recourse</a> of all citizens, undermining Article 32 of the Indian Constitution. When private buyers procure produce below the MSP, it affects both farmers and agricultural labourers, said Laxmibai. “If a farmer gets a good price, only then will they earn and pay labourers.” With these laws, she added, “More private companies will increase in the market. Aamhi bhaav karu shaknar nahi [We won’t be able to negotiate the price].”

At the Azad Maidan protest, Suvarna Gangurde, 38, from Korhate village in Dindori taluka, agreed that women would be among the worst affected by these laws. “About 70-80 per cent of farming is done by women,” said Suvarna, who belongs to the Koli Mahadev Adivasi community. “But look at the PM-Kisan Yojana. None of that money is deposited in any woman’s bank account in our village.” The yojana, a central government scheme, entitles small and marginal farmers to receive Rs. 6,000 every year as income support. According to Suvarna, out of the 64 Adivasi families in Korhate village, only 55 were given ‘7/12’  (record of land rights) in 2012, under the <a href="https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/the-scheduled-tribes-and-other-traditional-forest-dwellers-recognition-of-forest-rights-act-2006/">Forest Rights Act, 2006</a>. But the records include the shera (remark) – potkharaba jameen (uncultivable land). “We are the third generation farming on this land, so how can they say it’s potkharaba jameen?” she asks.Suvarna grows tomatoes, bhuimug (groundnut), coriander, dill leaves, spinach and other leafy vegetables on the five acres of land she cultivates. She only owns two acres, even though she is entitled to the rest. “Fasavnuk keleli aahe [We have been fooled],” she said. Despite seeking land titles in their name, Korhate&#39;s Adivasi farmers were given a joint 7/12. “Because of the shera, we can neither get crop loans nor dig a well or borewell in our farms, which stops us from storing rainwater. We can’t even dig a farm pond,” added Suvarna. From Korhate, 50 farmers and agricultural labourers came to Mumbai to join the protests. Of them 35 were women. The protesting farmers had decided to go to Raj Bhavan, the residence of Maharashtra’s governor, in south Mumbai, on January 25. They wanted to submit a charter of their demands seeking a repeal of the three farm laws; procurement of crops at MSP; land titles in their name; and a withdrawal of the four labour codes introduced in 2020.

Before the march to Raj Bhavan, Mathurabai Barde, a 45-year-old Bhil Adivasi farmer from Ahmadnagar district, was busy scanning several yellow-coloured forms. Drawn up by the All India Kisan Sabha, which had brought the protest together at the maidan, the forms contained a list of common problems faced by farmers. The list included problems like ‘The 7/12 of the land which I cultivate hasn’t been given to me’; ‘Only a certain part of the cultivated land has been given to me’; ‘Instead of giving me the land title, the authorities told me to vacate the land’. Each farmer had to select the issues they faced, and the completed forms were to be handed over with the charter of demands to the governor. Mathurabai was making sure that all the women farmers from her village, Shindodi, in Sangamner taluka, filled up their form correctly. She kept checking her handwritten list of farmers’ names to verify that each had written their details properly.Back in her village, Mathurabai cultivates 7.5 acres of land. Her recent experience with private traders has made her more determined to protest against the new laws. The traders paid her Rs. 900 for a quintal of wheat, she said, which was far less than Rs. 1925 – the approved MSP for wheat in 2020-2021. “They sell the same wheat to us in the market at thrice the price. We are the ones who grow it, and still we are asked to pay much more,” said Mathurabai.   The farmers&#39; march to Raj Bhavan on January 25 was cancelled because the Mumbai Police denied permission. Angry that they could not meet the governor, Mathurabai said, “We won’t stop fighting. It is we who grow the crops for everyone, including the governor and the prime minister.”

'They sell our wheat to us at thrice the price'

‘আমাদের গম আমাদেরকেই তিনগুণ দামে বেচে’

‘మా గోధుమలని మూడు రెట్ల ధరకి తిరిగి మాకే అమ్ముతారు’

അവർ ഞങ്ങളുടെ ഗോതമ്പ് മൂന്നിരട്ടി വിലയ്ക്കു ഞങ്ങൾക്കു തന്നെ വിൽക്കും

'એ લોકો અમારા જ ઘઉં અમને ત્રણ ગણા ભાવે વેચે છે'

"ಅವರು ನಮ್ಮ ಗೋಧಿಯನ್ನೇ ನಮಗೆ ಅದರ ಮೂರು ಪಟ್ಟು ಬೆಲೆಗೆ ಮಾರಾಟ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಾರೆ"

எங்களின் கோதுமையை மும்மடங்கு விலையில் எங்களுக்கு விற்கிறார்கள்

‘ସେମାନେ ଆମରି ଗହମ ଆମକୁ ତିନି ଗୁଣ ଦରରେ ବିକନ୍ତି’

'ਉਹ ਸਾਡੀ ਹੀ ਕਣਕ ਸਾਨੂੰ ਤਿਗੁਣੇ ਭਾਅ 'ਤੇ ਵੇਚਦੇ ਹਨ'

‘वे हमारा ही गेहूं हमें तीन गुनी क़ीमत पर बेचते हैं’

’وہ ہمارا ہی گیہوں ہمیں تین گُنی قیمت پر فروخت کرتے ہیں‘

‘आमचाच गहू आम्हाला तिप्पट भावाने विकतात’

Azad Maidan

At present, we can only accept donations in Indian rupees by Indian citizens. All donations made to the CounterMedia Trust are eligible for exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Here is a copy of our exemption certificate.


India is bigger than New Delhi. And people need to know more about the rest of this vast nation.


Younger, media-saturated generations are growing up knowing little about their country, but a lot about the elites of a few metros and towns. For a narrowly-owned, commercially-driven media, the dumbing down of a nation is part of standard operating procedure. The last available data of the Centre for Media Studies (CMS, Delhi) show us that reports from New Delhi account for 66 per cent of news on the front pages of major dailies. The CMS data also found that just about 0.24 per cent of front page news came out of rural India. The TV channels are not much better.PARI exists to change that.We are a non-profit organisation. We publish under creative commons, and do not charge readers a subscription fee or put-up advertisements. Nothing is behind a paywall and we are completely free-to-access by anyone. We guard our independence and receive no direct grants from governments and corporations, nor any funding that could dictate our content. So, we are dependent on volunteer labour, donations from individuals, foundations and institutions that see value in independent and free media.PARI is changing the way Indian journalism reports and documents the rural.India is more than the elite of a few metros and towns. We report on rural lives and livelihoods, languages, communities, migrants and more. We need your help to pull off this most ambitious of Indian journalistic endeavours. The scale of this effort costs money. Donate generously - and spread the word about PARI.&nbsp;

Donate FAQs


ہمارے بارے میں جانیں

پاری میں آپ کا خیرمقدم ہے

گے۔ اگر آپ کو ہمارا کام پسند ہے، تو آپ ہمارے رضاکار بن کر ہمارا تعاون کر سکتے ہیں یا ہماری مالی مدد کر سکتے ہیں، تاکہ ہم اپنا کام جاری رکھ سکیں۔

Want to republish this article? Please write to <a href="mailto:zahra@ruralindiaonline.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">zahra@ruralindiaonline.org</a> with a cc to <a href="mailto:namita@ruralindiaonline.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">namita@ruralindiaonline.org</a>

'They sell our wheat to us at thrice the price'

Women farmers and farm workers who have been fighting for their land rights, were protesting in Mumbai against the new farm laws so they don't lose out more from the sale of farm produce below the MSP

Related stories

A rain-scented walk in Sivagangai

Living on ravaged land

Biswas and the bamboos on his bike

Recycling energy, Godda style

Bhadels of Goa

Pookadai: still throbbing with morning life

Koli Kadlas

Malnourishment high among children of migrants: study

Wheels of the rural Indian West

Living Under a Red Cloud in Bellary

Vedla – earrings of the Maher community

Dreaming of water, drowning in debt

Kali: the dancer and his dreams

Farmer's diet worse than a convict's

In Yavatmal, life goes on

Suicides are about the living, not the dead

Death of a carpenter

Hoisa Shigmo!

Women farmers: weaving a life in Anantapur

Defiant in Dhinkia

Spice and all that's nice

Kerala's Green Army

The ‘jugaad’ not-a-mobile

Health as someone else's wealth

Calibrating in a Kudumbashree assembly unit