Apekshita Varshney

Sharmila Joshi

Editor

large_001-IMG_20181202_143405-AV.jpg

medium_001-IMG_20181202_143405-AV.jpg

small_001-IMG_20181202_143405-AV.jpg

thumbnail_001-IMG_20181202_143405-AV.jpg

001-IMG_20181202_143405-AV.jpg

“I’ve been amazed only once in my life,” says
60-year-old  Bhaiyyan Kushwaha, while
describing Mangal Singh’s water turbine. It’s a hot afternoon in Dashrara, a village in Lalitpur district of Uttar Pradesh.  Bhaiyyan is scattering wheat seeds in one
part of his 15-acre farm. “This was barren land until the turbine made
irrigation easy [for a while], some 30 years ago.” 

He hesitates before describing how the turbine
worked. “I am not educated,” he mumbles. He first saw a wooden wheel near the Sajnam river, close to his
land, in 1987, at a small check dam built by local labourers. “The wheel was
connected to a ‘gearbox’, and when water would flow in the wheel would turn and
the water would reach us [some 1-2 kilometres away]. All I had to do to was insert
wooden ‘gates’ to start or stop the flow of water through the machine. 

But it wasn&#39;t the machinery that surprised
Bhaiyyan as much as the conversation that followed: “When I asked how much it
would cost, he said it was free. The turbine needed neither diesel not
electricity to supply water. I was shocked.”

Mangal Singh, 71, belongs to an affluent Rajput landowning family in Bhelonilodh village of Bar block in Lalitpur district. Growing up in a farming community, he knew how much the dependence on water contributed to poverty in his and other villages of the Bundelkhand region. While the Sajnam river brought water, pumping from it required power or diesel – and a significant monetary investment.

“A large part of the farmer’s savings were
slashed by the diesel bills. My desire to help farmers led me to think about
the possibilities of lifting water from streams and canals without depending on
diesel or electricity,” Singh says. “I used to play with pinwheels [a simple
wind-driven spinning toy] as a child. In my 30s, I had a brainwave – what if a
large pinwheel, or simply, a wheel, could help pump water?” 

Around 1986, Singh built a wooden wheel
(two-metres in diameter, made from local babool wood) fabricated
with 12 blades (flat wooden slabs fixed to the rim). In later years, he replaced
the wood with iron sheets because wood was expensive and  prone to decay in water. “The wheel was then
mounted on a steel shaft and supported by two bearing blocks. The shaft was
coupled with a gearbox for stepping up the speed of rotation. The gearbox had
two ends – one end had a centrifugal pump to lift water and supply it till up
to two kilometres through pipes, and the other end was mounted with a pulley.” By
the 1990s, Singh improvised further and began to connect the pulley to run farm
machines like a crusher or grinder.

In a 1998 study on the water resources of
Bundelkhand, researchers from the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, found
much to appreciate in their analysis of the device. They said that manufacturing
one turbine would cost Rs 1.8 lakhs and that “two turbines on one site have the
potential to irrigate 200 hectares of land” and “considering 500 suitable
hydrosites... for installing the Mangal Turbine, it is estimated that...25 MW
energy can be easily generated.”

Singh, aware of the device’s utility, had already
patented it in 1997 (patent no. 177190 of November 13, 1997) at the Patent
Office, Delhi, which is administered by the Controller General of Patents,
Designs &amp; Trade Marks.
But that did not help take his innovation far.

Khushilal Kushwaha, 41, remembers that his father used the Mangal Turbine (as the local Hindi press started calling it) to water their fields in the early 1990s. “I was 12-13 years old then. I remember that from almost no crops, the availability of water meant we were growing many times more wheat and peas.” Kushwaha wonders how Singh managed to build the turbine without any technical expertise. (Mangal Singh could not complete his Bachelor’s in Science at the Government Degree College in Tikamgarh, Madhya  Pradesh, because of a students’ protest in 1967.)

“It was trial and error,” Singh says. “I
constantly innovated and perfected the device at a recurring personal cost.”
(He doesn&#39;t remember the amount and hasn&#39;t kept records.) And this started him
off on a decades-long struggle to find funding for his idea of using the
locally-made turbine for irrigation.

After the first device became operational around
1986, Singh began to spread the word.  “I
took my invention to people through letters. CAPART [the Council for
Advancement of People&#39;s Action and Rural Technology of the Ministry of Rural
Development] was among the first to get interested. In 1988, CAPART provided me
with a Rs. 48,500 grant to build and install an additional prototype of the
turbine in my village, Bhelonilodh.” Singh had built his first turbine in
Dashrara, around three kilometres
away, finding that location closer to more farms. 

The Dashrara turbine had got visitors hurrying to
see the installation. Among them, Singh recalls, was Sarla Gopalan, advisor to
the then Planning Commission. Singh has kept her letters of support, and he
shows them to me. The device was also inspected and appreciated by the
Alternate Hydro Energy Center at IIT Roorkee and The Energy Research Institute,
Delhi [TERI]. CAPART commissioned Singh to make
a few more turbines.

But soon, Singh says, “corruption, harassment and
victimisation” started. “Government agencies would give me a low-budget project
and then stop the instalments. When I would use my own funds to complete the
turbine, they would send a monitoring team and impose objections such as not
submitting cash books, not doing this or that. 
I would plead with them that I am an individual innovator, not an NGO
and I cannot work like an office with various staff… but the harassment would
continue.”

Much later, in 2010-11, the Ministry of Rural
Development appointed B.P. Maithani, a former professor at the North Eastern Regional Centre of the National Institute of Rural Development &amp; Panchayati Raj, Guwahati, and a former member-convenor of the north-east and central
zones of CAPART. He was asked to look into Singh’s allegations.

His report discussed the projects that were
sanctioned to Singh by the District Rural Development Agencies (DRDA) of Uttar
Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh in their villages, along with CAPART, and records
the neglect and red-tape. Maithani writes, “The tragedy was that Shri Mangal
Singh could not complete most of these projects due to hurdles created in the
release of funds by the sponsors.”

For example, in 1996, the report says, CAPART
placed Singh under FAS (&#39;Further Assistance Stopped&#39;) “on a trivial issue of not
submitting proper utilisation report of the paltry sum of Rs 6,400 released to
him for a project in 1990.”

“I wanted to continue the work but it was
impossible to fund it,” Singh says. “I wrote infinite letters and it was only
after several efforts that I managed to get myself delisted from the FAS
category.” This enabled Singh to secure another project in 2001 from CAPART of
building five turbines at Kanji Ghat on the Sajnam river, around 3.5 kilometres from Bhelonilodh. He had already
installed one wheel there before 2001. 

Work on each of
the five included finding a suitable location, creating check dams, building
and installing the turbine, and maintaining it. The new project, however, would remain embroiled
in similar controversies. 

The
Maithani report notes that from the project cost of 16.8 lakhs, only Rs. 12
lakhs was released to Singh “at different times from 2003-2011”. When Singh requested
that the remaining amount be released, “CAPART reminded him about seeking a
formal progress report on the prescribed format and audited statement of
account as a condition for any further release.”

By the early 2000s, the under-installation turbines at Kanji Ghat (as the location is locally called)  came to a standstill because of what the Maithani report calls “sabotage by opponents… to the extent that several turbines and pipelines laid by Singh were damaged and destroyed.” The report notes that a person, previously “a supervisor in the Mangal Turbine workshop…with support and patronage from local administration…installed his own turbine just half a kilometre downstream of Kanji Ghat.” It submerged the assets of the Mangal Turbines being built at the same location.

Over around two decades, starting from 1986, Singh estimates he helped install around 50 turbines, most of them in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, a few in Gujarat. These were commissioned not just by CAPART but also some NGOs and the District Rural Development Agencies. Each turbine needed maintenance and monitoring. But all of Singh’s time, he says, was taken up by the search for funding and the long battle with bureaucracy. The turbines started falling into disuse and disrepair. And the paucity of funding meant that, after some years,  no new turbines could be installed.The original Mangal Turbine at Dashrara was operational for around two decades, after which it too became dysfunctional. Its pipes and parts were stolen and taken away. &quot;It was an extremely difficult time for me financially, which made it impossible to maintain the turbine,” Singh says. “All my energy was going in completing needless government processes, formalities and securing funds than on maintaining and improving what I had originally built.&quot;The loss is deeply felt by the villagers. “I am now spending over Rs. 50,000  [during the October-March agriculture season] to water my fields through the diesel pump when I remember a time I used to do it for free,” Bhaiyyan Kushwaha says.

The price of pumping water using diesel
(which also has an environmental cost), has added to the costs incurred by
farmers. This, along with the poor returns on agriculture, have compelled many
from Dashrara and Bhelonilodh to quit farming. Among them is Shivdayal Rajput,
60, whose family used the turbine to irrigate their land for some years. “Today
it’s far more profitable to run a groceries shop,” he says. 

Umro Kushwaha, 64, who says the turbine
helped irrigate his 15 acres where he cultivated wheat, peas and cauliflower, has now leased out his land. His wife, Shyambai,
says, “Only those who can afford to dig a well or buy diesel for water pumps
can farm.”

Singh’s hopes now rest with the part of Maithani
report that demands the government agencies help in “restoration of the
turbines, withdraw charges against him, defreeze his bank account, and suitably
reward him for his invention and contributions for the betterment of society”. 

CAPART, however, has refused to accept the
recommendations. It argues in a letter to Singh that “The report of Maithani
and the recommendations/observations contained therein are not based on the
examination of the terms and conditions of sanction of grant-in-aid to Shri
Mangal Singh which were accepted by him…”“

But Singh has not given up. He is fighting a case
against CAPART in the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, in Bundelkhand&#39;s dry fields, those wheels have ceased to turn. Their gears no longer transmit power– perhaps recognising that power can only flow from Delhi.

Mangal Singh's wheel of misfortune

মঙ্গল সিং-এর দুর্দশা-চক্র

मंगल सिंह यांचं दुर्भाग्यचक्र

منگل سنگھ کی بدقسمتی کا پہیہ

मंगल सिंह के दुर्भाग्य का पहिया

ମଙ୍ଗଲ ସିଂଙ୍କ ଦୁର୍ଭାଗ୍ୟର ଚକ

Dashrara

At present, we can only accept donations in Indian rupees by Indian citizens. All donations made to the CounterMedia Trust are eligible for exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Here is a copy of our exemption certificate.


India is bigger than New Delhi. And people need to know more about the rest of this vast nation.


Younger, media-saturated generations are growing up knowing little about their country, but a lot about the elites of a few metros and towns. For a narrowly-owned, commercially-driven media, the dumbing down of a nation is part of standard operating procedure. The last available data of the Centre for Media Studies (CMS, Delhi) show us that reports from New Delhi account for 66 per cent of news on the front pages of major dailies. The CMS data also found that just about 0.24 per cent of front page news came out of rural India. The TV channels are not much better.PARI exists to change that.We are a non-profit organisation. We publish under creative commons, and do not charge readers a subscription fee or put-up advertisements. Nothing is behind a paywall and we are completely free-to-access by anyone. We guard our independence and receive no direct grants from governments and corporations, nor any funding that could dictate our content. So, we are dependent on volunteer labour, donations from individuals, foundations and institutions that see value in independent and free media.PARI is changing the way Indian journalism reports and documents the rural.India is more than the elite of a few metros and towns. We report on rural lives and livelihoods, languages, communities, migrants and more. We need your help to pull off this most ambitious of Indian journalistic endeavours. The scale of this effort costs money. Donate generously - and spread the word about PARI.&nbsp;

Donate FAQs


আমাদের সম্বন্ধে জানুন

পারি’র দুনিয়ায় স্বাগত

আমাদের যাবতীয় লেখাপত্তর নিখরচায় ব্যবহার করা যায়, আর আগামীদিনেও এই নিয়মই বজায় থাকবে। আমাদের কাজকর্ম ভালো লাগলে আপনি স্বেচ্ছাশ্রম দিয়ে অথবা অর্থ সাহায্য করে এই কাজে সহায়ক হতে পারেন।

Want to republish this article? Please write to <a href="mailto:zahra@ruralindiaonline.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">zahra@ruralindiaonline.org</a> with a cc to <a href="mailto:namita@ruralindiaonline.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">namita@ruralindiaonline.org</a>

Mangal Singh's wheel of misfortune

In the mid-80s, Mangal Singh made a low-cost turbine to irrigate the fields of Lalitpur district in UP. Soon after, he got stuck in a long struggle with bureaucracy and funding, which has destroyed his innovation

Related stories

A rain-scented walk in Sivagangai

Living on ravaged land

Biswas and the bamboos on his bike

Recycling energy, Godda style

Bhadels of Goa

Pookadai: still throbbing with morning life

Koli Kadlas

Malnourishment high among children of migrants: study

Wheels of the rural Indian West

Living Under a Red Cloud in Bellary

Vedla – earrings of the Maher community

Dreaming of water, drowning in debt

Kali: the dancer and his dreams

Farmer's diet worse than a convict's

In Yavatmal, life goes on

Suicides are about the living, not the dead

Death of a carpenter

Hoisa Shigmo!

Women farmers: weaving a life in Anantapur

Defiant in Dhinkia

Spice and all that's nice

Kerala's Green Army

The ‘jugaad’ not-a-mobile

Health as someone else's wealth

Calibrating in a Kudumbashree assembly unit