Aniket Aga

Reporting

Chitrangada Choudhury

P. Sainath

Editor

Series Editors

Sharmila Joshi

large_01-IMG_2731-CC-Cotton_has_now_become_a_headache.jpg

medium_01-IMG_2731-CC-Cotton_has_now_become_a_headache.jpg

small_01-IMG_2731-CC-Cotton_has_now_become_a_headache.jpg

thumbnail_01-IMG_2731-CC-Cotton_has_now_become_a_headache.jpg

01-IMG_2731-CC-Cotton_has_now_become_a_headache.jpg

“The more we buy, the more we are in
debt.” That’s Kunari Sabari, a farmer in her 40s, speaking to us in Khaira, a
village mainly of her own Saora Adivasi community.

“The gobarakhatachaasa,
halaachasaa [farming with cow dung and
ploughs], which was ours, nobody is doing that anymore,” she said. “Now we run
to the market for everything. Seeds, pesticides, fertiliser. Unlike before,
even what we eat, we have to buy.”

Kunari’s account reflects a dependence brought about by
cotton cultivation that is taking root across the ecologically sensitive
highland tracts of Odisha’s Rayagada district, with deep implications for its
rich store of biodiversity, farmers’ distress and food security (See <a href="https://ruralindiaonline.org/articles/sowing-the-seeds-of-climate-crisis-in-odisha/">Sowing the seeds of climate crisis in Odisha</a>).
This was clearly visible as we descended south-east to the plains of Rayagada’s
Gunupur block, where cotton first arrived. Bordering Andhra Pradesh, the
landscape here is one of monocrop fields of cotton as far as the eye could see.
Also visible – deep distress.

“We took to cotton 10-12 years ago. We
do it now because we have no other choice.” That’s what many people in Khaira,
which is in Gunupur block, told us. Several farmers in the area said that as
they shifted towards a capital-intensive cotton, they had progressively lost
their own seeds and traditional methods of multi-cropping.

“We had our own crops and our own
agriculture,” rued Khetra Sabara, a young Saora cultivator. “Andhrawallas
came and told us to grow cotton, and taught us everything.” Santosh Kumar
Dandasena, another farmer here, added that the prospect of making profit drew
villagers to kappa, or cotton.
“Initially it gave happiness, we made money. But now, it is only misery and
loss,” he said. “We have got destroyed and the sahucars
[moneylenders] are happy.”

Dark green John Deere tractors rumbled
up and down the village road as we spoke. The walls of the local temple were
plastered with seed company posters in Odia advertising Bt cotton. Tilling and
sowing equipment for that crop lay around the village square.

02-CC-Cotton_has_now_become_a_headache.jpg

“Most of the cotton farmers are indebted,
because the seed and input costs are increasing while the sale price of the
produce fluctuates; and the middlemen take away the profit,” Debal Deb, <a href="https://ruralindiaonline.org/articles/the-barefoot-conservator-debal-deb/">a
conservationist working in the region</a>, explains. “In
Rayagada, many farmers get as little as 20 per cent of the market price [for
their produce].”

Why persist with cotton in the face of
mounting losses? “We are tied in debt to the sahucar,”
said Sabara. “If we do not sow cotton, he will not lend to us anymore.”
Dandasena added, “If we grow say, rice, we will not get any loans. Only
cotton.”

“Farmers don’t understand this crop they are
growing,” Deb’s colleague, Debdulal Bhattacharya, tells us. “They are
completely dependent on the market at every step… from sowing to harvest, and
can’t take their own decisions [though]... they own the land. Should we call
them farmers or labourers on their own farms?”

Perhaps the most devastating impact of
cotton’s spread, Deb and his colleagues point out, is the erosion of local
biodiversity, and with it the knowledge of communities who work in, and
sustain, this ecologically rich landscape. Both are critical to an agriculture
that is climate-resilient – with the capacity to withstand the increasing uncertainties
and extremities of weather. 

“Climate change,” Deb says, “is inducing abrupt vagaries of the local
weather. Prolonged spells of drought, too much untimely rain, and more frequent
droughts are already [being] experienced by Odisha farmers.” Cotton as
well as modern varieties of rice and vegetables, which are replacing heirloom
varieties, &quot;are inherently incapable of surviving the sudden changes in
local environmental conditions. This means a severe uncertainty of crop plant
survival, pollination, productivity, and finally, food security.&quot; Rainfall data for the region, and the accounts of farmers, all point to increasingly erratic weather. Average annual rainfall for the district in the period 2014-18 was 1,385 mm. That was 34 per cent higher than the 1,034 mm for the five years of 1996-2000 (show data of the India Meteorological Department and the central Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change). Also, as <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00704-019-02983-w">a 2019 study</a> by researchers from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar, found: &quot;The heavy-to-extreme rainfall days, as well as dry days, are notably increasing while light-to-moderate rainfall days and wet days are decreasing in Odisha.”

“For the
past three years… the rains have been coming in late,” Sharanya Nayak, a farmer and activist based in neighbouring Koraput district, tells us. “There has been less rainfall in the initial monsoon period,
followed by extreme rainfall in mid-season, and then heavy rainfall” towards
the end of the season. This means sowing gets delayed, extreme rains mean no
sun in the crucial mid-season, and heavy downpours at the end damage the
harvest. 

Debjeet
Sarangi, from Living Farms, an NGO which works on food and agriculture in the region, concurs: “The monsoon season in this region used to go from mid-June
until October. In the last few years, however, it has become erratic.” Both
Sarangi and Nayak argue that Odisha&#39;s multi-cropping systems, with an emphasis
on indigenous food crops, are better suited than cotton to cope with these
vagaries. “It is our experience that multi-crop farmers are better able to cope
with such erratic weather patterns,” Sarangi says. “Farmers who are linked to
the market through a single crop of Bt cotton are sitting on a time bomb.”

Several farmers sense the dangers to food security and autonomy of cultivation under the new GM monoculture dispensation – even as they are taking to the new practices. But many others, in particular women, insist that they should not abandon their traditional agriculture. In Kerandiguda village, against the backdrop of the Niyamgiri, we came across Kunuji Kulusika, a Kondh Adivasi woman dissuading her son Surendra from growing cotton this year.She was hard at work, barefoot in a mountainside plot of shifting cultivation. In her knee-length saree worn without a blouse, and hair pulled back in a side knot, Kunuji looked the archetype of the Adivasi woman who features in ads by governments, corporations and NGOs, promising to uplift her from ‘backwardness’. Yet, as Deb suggests, the erosion of the advanced knowledge and skills of people like Kunuji will be devastating for a world grappling with climate change.“If we abandon our [own] crops even for a year,” Kunuji said, explaining why she feared shifting to cotton, “how will we replenish the seeds? We will run the danger of losing them. Last year, Surendra grew some cotton where we would plant makka [maize]. If we continue like this, we will be left with no maize seeds of our own to sow in the future.”

Kunuji became visibly excited when we
mentioned heirloom seeds. She raced into her house and emerged with different
varieties of crops grown by the family, which she had stored in bamboo baskets,
plastic jars or cloth bags. First: two varieties of pigeon pea, “to be sown
depending on the incline of the land.” Next: an upland paddy, mustard, moong or green gram, biri or
black gram, and two types of beans. Then: two varieties of finger millets,
maize, niger seeds. Lastly: a sack of siali
seeds (a forest food). “If it rains too much, and we have to stay
home-bound, we roast these and eat,” she said, and roasted a handful for us. 

“The agro-ecological knowledge of the Kondhs
and other tribes here was so sophisticated that families were able to grow
70-80 crops over the year in one plot – cereals, pulses, roots, tubers,
millets,” says Pradeep Patra of Living Farms. “It still exists in a few
patches, but overall, the coming of cotton and its spread in the past 20 years
has proven devastating for this seed diversity.” 

Kunuji also fears the impacts of the
chemical inputs. These are indispensable to growing cotton, while hardly ever used
by Adivasi families for their traditional crops. “All those pesticides, those
fertilisers – Surendra will put all that on the cotton [plants]. Won’t that
spoil our soil, kill everything else in it? I saw with my own eyes on a farm
next to mine – when they went back to planting mandia [finger millets], it did not do well, it was stunted.”  

Herbicide-tolerant cotton seeds are not
permitted in India, but are spreading like wildfire through Rayagada, along
with associated chemicals like glyphosate, a “<a href="https://www.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/MonographVolume112-1.pdf">probably carcinogenic</a>” herbicide. “Owing to
regular use of herbicides,” says Debal Deb, “companion flora, including several
hedge plants and grasses, have disappeared from the fields. That has led to the
decline in butterflies and moth populations, which depend on non-crop plants.

“The ecological knowledge base of this
region [and its biodiversity] has eroded alarmingly. More and more farmers
are abandoning their traditional multi-cropping and agroforestry systems
in favour of monocultures, which demand high amounts of pesticides. Cotton
farmers are also using herbicides. Most of them… don&#39;t know which insects are
actually pests and which are not. So they spray to eliminate all insects.”

With the shift to cotton, says
Sharanya Nayak, “every insect, bird, animal is seen through just one lens
– as an enemy of the crop. This then is the perfect alibi for
indiscriminate use of agri-chemical inputs.&quot; 

Kunuji recognises that people were
seeing its ill-effects, yet taking to cotton. “They see this much money at one
time,” she said, spreading her hands out. “And they get lured.”

04_odSoanj.jpg

“Community systems of seed-sharing and exchange,
pooling of livestock and labour for work on the farm,” says Patra, were also
getting eroded as cotton edged out traditional crops. “Now farmers look to the
moneylender and the trader.”

An agriculture officer in the district (who
did not want to be identified) concurred with Patra. He admitted that it was
the state that had introduced and promoted cotton in villages here in the
1990s. The aggressive push from private seed and agri-chemical input dealers
from neighbouring Andhra Pradesh, followed. While the government is worried,
the officer admitted that there was little being done to address the explosion
of fake and illegal seeds, and the growing consumption of agri-chemicals. “Cotton
has now become a headache,” he said.

Yet, the lure of money is powerful,
especially for young farmers. With aspirations of English education for their
children, smartphones and motorbikes, and impatience with their parents’ ways
of farming, cotton seems worth the risk. If markets are down one year, they may
be up the next. 

Ecology, however, is less forgiving. 

“There is an
undocumented increase in the frequency of hospitalisation and in the types of
diseases. The number of people suffering from various nerve and kidney diseases
is quite high,” says Deb. “I suspect these are from exposure to organophosphate
pesticides and glyphosate herbicide, which are in wide use in the
district.” 

Dr. John Oommen, who practices at the
54-year-old Christian Hospital, Bissamcuttack, says that such causal links are
hard to make in the absence of dedicated investigations. “The focus of the
state is still on communicable diseases like malaria. But the fastest growing
diseases which we are seeing among tribals here are heart and kidney ailments...
chronic kidney diseases in fact, and the numbers are huge.” 

He points out that “all private
hospitals in the area have started dialysis centres, and it is a fantastic
business. We will have to investigate the question – what is causing kidney
failure on this scale?” Oommen expresses concern that communities which had
sustained themselves for hundreds of years were being exposed or bulldozed into
changes they were little prepared for.

Back in the Niyamgiri mountains that week, on a warm morning, we met Obi Nag, a middle-aged Kondh Adivasi farmer walking toward his plot of land with a metal pot and a one-litre bottle of Glycel, a liquid formulation of glyphosate, manufactured by the Maharashtra-based Excel Crop Care Limited. Nag was carrying a blue hand-operated sprayer on his bare back. He stopped by a small mountainside stream beside his plot, and set his load down. Using the pot, he filled the sprayer with water. Then he added two capfuls of glyphosate “as per the shopkeeper’s directions.” He stirred it vigorously, strapped on the sprayer again and began spraying the vegetation on his plot. “All this will be dead in three days, and the farm will be ready for sowing cotton,” he said.

05-CC-Cotton_has_now_become_a_headache.jpg

The warnings on the glyphosate bottle, in
English, Hindi and Gujarati, included these: Keep away from foodstuffs, empty
foodstuff containers, and animal food; Avoid contact with mouth, eyes and skin; Avoid
inhalation [of] the spray mist. Spray in direction of [the] wind; Wash
thoroughly the contaminated clothes and parts of the body after spraying; Wear
full protective clothing while mixing and spraying. 

Nag was bare-bodied except for a small garment
around his waist. As he sprayed, droplets fell on his feet and legs, while the
wind carried the mist of herbicide over to us, to the tree standing in the
middle of his plot, and to adjoining fields. As well as into the stream flowing
by his farm, which gushed down to other fields and skirted by a cluster of some
10 houses and their hand pump.

Three days later we came by Nag’s plot
again, and found a small boy grazing cows close by. We asked Nag if the
glyphosate he had sprayed could imperil the cows, and he said confidently: “No,
it’s been three days. Had they grazed the day I had sprayed, they would have
fallen ill and maybe died.” 

We asked the boy how he knew which
fields were freshly sprayed with glyphosate to avoid taking his livestock into.
He shrugged and said “farmers tell us if they have sprayed herbicides.” The
boy’s father told us that a neighbouring village had seen some cattle deaths
last year after the animals grazed on a freshly-sprayed plot.

Meanwhile most of the grass on Nag’s
plot had wilted. It was ready for sowing cotton. 

Cover photo: Mohini
Sabara, a Saora Adivasi tenant farmer in Rayagada’s Gunupur block, says they grew food crops until some years
ago, and now only grow Bt cotton. (Photo:
Chitrangada Choudhury)

PARI’s nationwide reporting project on climate change is part of a
UNDP-supported initiative to capture that phenomenon through the voices and
lived experience of ordinary people.

Want to republish this article? Please write
to zahra@ruralindiaonline.org with a cc to namita@ruralindiaonline.org

‘Cotton has now become a headache’

'ਨਰਮਾ ਬੀਜਣਾ ਹੁਣ ਕਿਸੇ ਸਿਰਦਰਦੀ ਤੋਂ ਘੱਟ ਨਹੀਂ'

‘పత్తి ఇప్పుడు తలనొప్పిగా మారింది’

ʼಹತ್ತಿ ಈಗ ತಲೆನೋವಾಗಿ ಪರಿಣಮಿಸಿದೆʼ

പരുത്തികൊണ്ട് വലഞ്ഞിരിക്കുന്നു

કપાસની ખેતી હવે માથાનો દુખાવો બની ગઈ છે

'பருத்தி இப்போது பெரும் தலைவலி ஆகிவிட்டது'

এতিয়া মূৰৰ কামোৰণীত পৰিণত হৈছে কঁপাহ

তুলো এখন মাথাব্যথা হয়ে দাঁড়িয়েছে

’کپاس اب سر درد بن گیا ہے‘

‘किसानों के लिए सिरदर्द बनी कपास की फ़सल’

‘କପା ଏବେ ମୁଣ୍ଡବ୍ୟଥାର କାରଣ ହୋଇଛି’

‘कापूस म्हणजे आता डोकेदुखीच झालाय’

Khaira

At present, we can only accept donations in Indian rupees by Indian citizens. All donations made to the CounterMedia Trust are eligible for exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Here is a copy of our exemption certificate.


India is bigger than New Delhi. And people need to know more about the rest of this vast nation.


Younger, media-saturated generations are growing up knowing little about their country, but a lot about the elites of a few metros and towns. For a narrowly-owned, commercially-driven media, the dumbing down of a nation is part of standard operating procedure. The last available data of the Centre for Media Studies (CMS, Delhi) show us that reports from New Delhi account for 66 per cent of news on the front pages of major dailies. The CMS data also found that just about 0.24 per cent of front page news came out of rural India. The TV channels are not much better.PARI exists to change that.We are a non-profit organisation. We publish under creative commons, and do not charge readers a subscription fee or put-up advertisements. Nothing is behind a paywall and we are completely free-to-access by anyone. We guard our independence and receive no direct grants from governments and corporations, nor any funding that could dictate our content. So, we are dependent on volunteer labour, donations from individuals, foundations and institutions that see value in independent and free media.PARI is changing the way Indian journalism reports and documents the rural.India is more than the elite of a few metros and towns. We report on rural lives and livelihoods, languages, communities, migrants and more. We need your help to pull off this most ambitious of Indian journalistic endeavours. The scale of this effort costs money. Donate generously - and spread the word about PARI.&nbsp;

Donate FAQs


Let’s get you acquainted

Welcome to PARI

All our content is, and will forever be free to consume. If you enjoy our work, you can support us by becoming a volunteer or by donating to help fund our work.

Want to republish this article? Please write to <a href="mailto:zahra@ruralindiaonline.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">zahra@ruralindiaonline.org</a> with a cc to <a href="mailto:namita@ruralindiaonline.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">namita@ruralindiaonline.org</a>

IN TELUGU - Want to republish this article? Please write to <a href="mailto:zahra@ruralindiaonline.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">zahra@ruralindiaonline.org</a> with a cc to <a href="mailto:namita@ruralindiaonline.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">namita@ruralindiaonline.org</a>

‘Cotton has now become a headache’

A chemical-intensive Bt cotton monoculture is spreading through Odisha’s Rayagada district – harming health, deepening debt, irreversibly eroding indigenous knowledge, and sowing the seeds of a climate crisis

Related stories

A rain-scented walk in Sivagangai

Living on ravaged land

Biswas and the bamboos on his bike

Recycling energy, Godda style

Bhadels of Goa

Pookadai: still throbbing with morning life

Koli Kadlas

Malnourishment high among children of migrants: study

Wheels of the rural Indian West

Living Under a Red Cloud in Bellary

Vedla – earrings of the Maher community

Dreaming of water, drowning in debt

Kali: the dancer and his dreams

Farmer's diet worse than a convict's

In Yavatmal, life goes on

Suicides are about the living, not the dead

Death of a carpenter

Hoisa Shigmo!

Women farmers: weaving a life in Anantapur

Defiant in Dhinkia

Spice and all that's nice

Kerala's Green Army

The ‘jugaad’ not-a-mobile

Health as someone else's wealth

Calibrating in a Kudumbashree assembly unit